# Astake dApp Staking Proposal

**URL:** <https://forum.astar.network/t/astake-dapp-staking-proposal/8057>\
**Category:** dApp Staking Applications\
**Created:** [February 21, 2025, 2:27am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/astake-dapp-staking-proposal/8057 "2025-02-21T02:27:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you425](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/you425/32/3313_2.png) [@you425](https://forum.astar.network/u/you425)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2025, 6:06am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/astake-dapp-staking-proposal/8057/2 "2025-02-21T06:06:57Z")

</div>

Thanks for the proposal!

Astake supports LSTs for dApp Staking in both Soneium and Astar, and I don’t see anything wrong with listing to dApp Staking itself.

However, as I mentioned in your introductory thread, I think the notation needs to be adjusted.

> [@Astake Introduction - Secure and reliable Liquid Staking on Astar and Soneium](https://forum.astar.network/t/astake-introduction-secure-and-reliable-liquid-staking-on-astar-and-soneium/7988/15):
>
> Thank you for your response. The 20% APR currently shown reflects the ideal APR, which includes bonus rewards. If we become ineligible for bonus rewards, the APR will decrease. This is why we’ve mentioned a 15%+ APR in our introduction—our goal is to provide realistic expectations, we won’t exaggerate. I agree with what @Juminstock is saying and think this is misleading and should be worded more accurately. I think it would be acceptable if it were at least expressed as “~19.91%” and explai…

@tksarah  
Regarding the dApp Staking application, I believe there is talk of a two-step review process with Community Council and Forum.  
What do you plan to do regarding this application?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.astar.network/t/astake-dapp-staking-proposal/8057)._