# Astar, Startale Labs, Soneium and the state of our ecosystem pt2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Astar\ **Created:** [July 14, 2025, 3:54pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-startale-labs-soneium-and-the-state-of-our-ecosystem-pt2/8709 "2025-07-14T15:54:43Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![pitcoin777](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/pitcoin777/32/1912_2.png) [@pitcoin777](https://forum.astar.network/u/pitcoin777)\ **Post date:** [July 16, 2025, 12:18pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-startale-labs-soneium-and-the-state-of-our-ecosystem-pt2/8709/9 "2025-07-16T12:18:55Z")
I’m not sure if you’re fully familiar with the **Astar Ecosystem Agent Program** , but I kindly encourage you to take a moment to read through all the details here: 🔗 [Astar Ecosystem Agent Program 2.5 - #2 by tksarah](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-ecosystem-agent-program-2-5/8654/2) What you’re suggesting, in summary, is already being done. There are **specific parameters** that each Council member evaluates individually, and **feedback is provided** to the Agents. The monthly reward is **fixed at $800** , with a potential **$200 bonus** if the Agent performs any additional activities that justify it. It doesn’t matter whether an Agent requests $100 or $1,000,000 — they are free to request any amount, but the **program parameters are clearly defined**. The final reward is based on the **average score of all Council members** , calculated against the $800 cap. In the end, the proposal submitted on-chain by the Agents reflects the amount that the Council considers fair for their contribution — based on the established evaluation parameters. I can assure you that **no Agent receives 100% of the amount** — the evaluation is strict and performance-based. Within the evaluation parameters, each item is scored from **0 to 100**. The **sum of all parameter scores determines the percentage** of the reward the Agent will receive. > [@Marroz](#): > > With ASTR’s value eroding, thousands of tokens are being distributed without tangible results. That statement is completely off-base. All work carried out by Ecosystem Agents is **evaluated based on performance, time commitment, and dedication to the ecosystem**. You are, of course, entitled to your personal opinion, and **constructive suggestions for improvement are always welcome** — but **baseless claims will not be taken into account**. Regarding payment in $ or ASTR, this was also **discussed internally by the Council** , and the current decision is to maintain the existing structure. Just for comparison, members of the **AFC and ACC** are required to contribute at least **2 hours per day**. Our Ecosystem Agents often **dedicate 4 to 5+ hours daily** to supporting and growing the Astar ecosystem. And in terms of cost, the **community treasury is more than capable** of covering compensation for our 13–14 Agents (if they deserve it) **while still growing month over month**. [Total Community Treasury Balance: **116,576,707.33 ASTR**](https://astar.subscan.io/account/YQnbw3oWxBju7z5CRVoq1K6JzwDaj6DNePwdc2R2fG7jdix) \> 110M currently staked If we were to completely remove the Agent Program, the **impact on the treasury — and on the token price — would be literally zero**. So that narrative simply doesn’t hold up. > [@Marroz](#): > > Paying the same dollar amount when things go poorly doesn’t inspire anyone That statement is completely off-base. It’s also important to note that **any parameter with poor performance is not scored at all** — meaning Agents are only evaluated on activities they’ve actually carried out. > [@Marroz](#): > > f I launch a program to promote and raise awareness for ASTR, I must put those who join in a position to feel motivated. However, the **Astar Community Council (ACC)** does **not have that prerogative** — our role is strictly to **define conduct, evaluate performance, and assess rewards** within the Agent Program. The responsibility for **recruitment, interviews, and the selection of new participants** in the program lies entirely with the **Astar Foundation**. Finally, **all suggestions for improvement are welcome**. The **Agent Program 2.5** was launched earlier this year and brought significant changes. It’s not a static initiative — it will continue to evolve based on feedback from the community and the Foundation’s needs. At the end of the year, we’ll be able to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses more clearly, and we strongly encourage community members like you to share your thoughts and opinions. It’s worth noting that the transition to Program 2.5 led some former Agents to leave — and that’s perfectly fine. We want people who are aligned with the **cultural values and mission of the Astar Foundation** , not bounty hunters simply chasing rewards. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-startale-labs-soneium-and-the-state-of-our-ecosystem-pt2/8709)._