# Astar Unofficial - dApp Staking Proposal **URL:** \ **Category:** dApp Staking Applications\ **Created:** [April 27, 2024, 10:27pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-unofficial-dapp-staking-proposal/6723 "2024-04-27T22:27:00Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![you425](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/you425/32/3313_2.png) [@you425](https://forum.astar.network/u/you425)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2024, 9:16am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-unofficial-dapp-staking-proposal/6723/17 "2024-05-01T09:16:46Z")
Thank you for the proposal. As an old time Astar supporting OG, I respect you. As for this proposal, it seems difficult to judge whether to adopt it as dApp Staking. Since it is more like a public good, it may be better to consider it as a separate category. Personally, the already proposed sub-treasury of on-chain governance seems most appropriate. > [@Setting Astar Network community and governance culture](https://forum.astar.network/t/setting-astar-network-community-and-governance-culture/6601/1): > > TL;DR I left Astar Foundation to create and propose Astar governance as a community member. The network engagement and governance activity do not reflect the increase in Astar’s public presence; only a few people are engaged with the network. The lack of clarity in our community culture makes introducing a functioning governance for Astar hard. People should be more aware of what projects they support through dApps Staking. Treasury spending should be evaluated based on the network’s return on … However, we do not currently have this system. Therefore, it seems suitable to have the actual BOT created and run on Telegram and retroactively fund it. Also, in the case of dApp Staking, it is not that easy to get into Tier 4. Therefore, it may not be possible to cover the costs. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-unofficial-dapp-staking-proposal/6723)._