# Q1 2026 – Astar Community Council Update

**URL:** <https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438>\
**Category:** Community Council\
**Created:** [April 3, 2026, 11:51am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438 "2026-04-03T11:51:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SimonB](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/simonb/32/2727_2.png) [@SimonB](https://forum.astar.network/u/SimonB)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 11:51am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/1 "2026-04-03T11:51:15Z")

</div>

## Q1 2026 – Astar Community Council Update

GM Astar community! 🌞  
As Q1 2026 comes to a close, the Astar Community Council is pleased to share an update on our activities, deliverables, and progress over the past quarter.

Throughout Q1, the ACC continued to focus on strengthening governance standards, improving operational efficiency, and aligning ecosystem programs with the updated Tokenomics 3.0 and dApp Staking framework.

* * *

## ✨ Highlights from Q1

**dApp Staking Entry Requirements Reinforcem** ent  
The Council worked on increasing the entry requirements for dApp Staking, with the goal of better filtering access to the program and ensuring that only projects providing real value to the ecosystem can be onboarded. This strengthens the overall quality and sustainability of the dApp Staking environment.

**Internal Monitoring Workflow for dApp Staking**  
A structured internal workflow was implemented to enable continuous monitoring of listed dApps. This system allows the ACC to regularly evaluate activity levels, ecosystem contribution, and overall performance of projects within dApp Staking.

**Ongoing dApp Staking Review & Delisting Activity**  
The Council continued its ongoing effort to remove inactive or low-value projects, ensuring that the program remains focused on meaningful contributors to the Astar ecosystem.

**dApp Staking Improvement Proposals**  
The ACC developed and discussed several ideas and proposals aimed at improving the dApp Staking system, focusing on efficiency, sustainability, and better alignment of incentives across the ecosystem.

**Astar Ambassador Fellowship (AAF) Development**  
Work continued on the organization and structuring of the Astar Ambassador Fellowship, further refining its operational framework and preparing it for progressive implementation.

**Internal Documentation Updates (Listing & Delisting Workflows)**  
Internal documentation related to dApp Staking listing and delisting processes was updated to improve clarity, consistency, and execution efficiency within the Council.

**Public Documentation Update (dApp Staking & Tokenomics 3.0)**  
The ACC updated and aligned all public documentation related to dApp Staking to reflect the latest changes introduced by the updated dApp Staking model and Tokenomics 3.0, ensuring consistency and transparency for the community.

**Collaboration with Foundation & AFC (Compensation Framework)**  
The Council collaborated with the Astar Foundation and the Astar Finance Committee (AFC) in structuring updates to the compensation model for Astar Collective participants, with particular focus on the Ambassador segment, transitioning from USD-based calculations to fixed ASTR-denominated amounts.

**Enhanced Ambassador Monitoring System**  
A more advanced monitoring system for Ambassador activity was developed, aimed at better capturing the real value contributed to the ecosystem. An internal dashboard was introduced, enabling the ACC to assign targeted tasks to Ambassadors, track execution, and evaluate both performance and quality of contributions.

**UCG Program Restructuring (Ongoing)**  
The ACC began a comprehensive restructuring of the UCG program, transitioning its vision from a bootstrapping initiative to a strategic staking actor.  
New goals and mechanisms have been defined to align the program with the updated dApp Staking structure (16 slots, 2 active tiers, stricter entry and monitoring requirements). This transformation is ongoing and will also include a rebranding of the program.

**Large-Scale dApp Staking Cleanup Initiative**  
The Council executed a major cleanup initiative, removing a total of 58 dApps that were no longer aligned with the program’s standards, based on:

- lack of recent contributions
- low dApp quality
- limited tangible value to the Astar Collective

This initiative was executed through two on-chain motions:

- First batch: 47 dApps delisted  
[dApp Staking: Remove low-performing or ghost dApps](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/141)
- Second batch: 11 dApps delisted  
[dApp Staking: Remove low-performing dApps (second round)](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/143)

* * *

## Additional Contributions

### ✅ dApp Staking Management

**Listings**  
During Q1, the Council evaluated and onboarded new projects into Astar’s dApp Staking program, in alignment with the updated entry requirements and the evolving Tokenomics 3.0 framework:

- CometSwap

* * *

**Delistings**  
During Q1, the ACC carried out a comprehensive cleanup of the dApp Staking ecosystem, removing projects that were no longer aligned with the program’s standards and expectations.

This included a large-scale cleanup initiative, executed through two on-chain motions:

- First batch: 47 dApps delisted  
[dApp Staking: Remove low-performing or ghost dApps](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/141)
- Second batch: 11 dApps delisted  
[dApp Staking: Remove low-performing dApps (second round)](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/143)

Forum discussion: [Large-Scale dApp Staking Cleanup Initiative](https://forum.astar.network/t/large-scale-dapp-staking-cleanup-initiative/9371)

Projects were delisted based on the following criteria:

- lack of recent contributions
- low dApp quality
- limited tangible value to the Astar Collective

Below is the complete list of all dApps delisted during Q1 2026:

- Neemo
- SFY Lab
- 3ridge
- AltLayer
- ApeXChimpz
- ArtZero
- AstridDAO
- Astar Blockchain Node Service
- AstarCats (New ODENDAO)
- AstarFarm
- Astar Sign Witch
- Astar Web3 Domains
- Bandit Network
- Callback
- CandyGirl
- ChainChaser
- D8A
- D’cent Wallet
- DeForm
- DMail
- FiDi
- GameDAO
- Guild.xyz
- Heroic Animals
- Kaiso Finance
- Keyvault
- Kirifuda
- Lotto
- Metadomo
- Moon
- Moonfit
- Neet
- NFT Pocket
- NFTs2Me
- Paima Engine
- Pinky
- Polkadot Multisig
- ProofX
- RAIR
- Rarible
- Rattle
- SiO2 Finance
- Singular
- SlashVision Labs
- Sonova
- SoneFi
- Steer Protocol
- Starlay Finance
- SushiTop
- Web3Alert
- Arthswap
- Astar Core Contributors
- JPYC
- Protofire
- Healthree
- Subwallet

* * *

## 🎉 Events Funding

**Guild Funding Proposal**  
ASTR Granted: 272,727 ASTR ASTR  
🔗 [Motion](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/138?tab=timeline)

* * *

## 👥 Agents Tips Evaluation & Management

During the initial part of Q1, the ACC carried out the following activities:

**Evaluation of Agents Reports**  
All official reports from Astar Agents related to Q4 25 contributions were reviewed and evaluated.

**On-chain Approval of Tips**  
The Council processed and approved the corresponding on-chain motions for Agents Tips distribution via the Community Treasury.

Details:

| [TkSarah](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/126) | ASTR 224,107.00 |
| --- | --- |
| [Matt](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/131) | ASTR 189,643.00 |
| [ZkVan](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/136) | ASTR 186,964.00 |
| [PitCoin](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/133) | ASTR 210,714.00 |
| [Emre](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/132) | ASTR 212,857.00 |
| [SimonB](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/130) | ASTR 180,714.00 |
| [EmanuCt96](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/127) | ASTR 218,214.00 |
| [MSPY](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/129) | ASTR 153,750.00 |
| [You425](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/128) | ASTR 235,357.00 |
| [BoomBLB](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/135) | ASTR 120,536.00 |
| [Pithecus](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/137) | ASTR 131,250.00 |

* * *

## 🔄 UCG Management

**19/01/26 – UCG REMOVED | SFY Lab (UCG Delisting)**  
Move 21M ASTR from SFY Lab to Community Treasury  
🔗 [Motion](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/123)

**25/02/26 – UCG REMOVED | NFT BRIDGES (UCG Delisting)**  
Move 21M ASTR from NFT BRIDGES to Community Treasury  
🔗 [Motion](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/140?tab=timeline)

**25/02/26 – UCG REMOVED | ARADIA (UCG Delisting)**  
Move 21M ASTR from ARADIA to Community Treasury  
🔗 [Motion](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/142?tab=timeline)

* * *

## 📊 Community Treasury Update

- Q4 2025 Closing Balance: ~123,014,058 ASTR
- **Q1 2026 Closing Balance: ~126,948,194 ASTR**

Despite regular expenses (Agents Tips, events funding, and other initiatives), the Community Treasury balance continued to grow thanks to staking returns, highlighting the sustainable design of the on-chain treasury strategy.

Community Treasury wallet:  
**YQnbw3oWxBju7z5CRVoq1K6JzwDaj6DNePwdc2R2fG7jdix**  
🔗 [Subscan link](https://astar.subscan.io/account/YQnbw3oWxBju7z5CRVoq1K6JzwDaj6DNePwdc2R2fG7jdix)

* * *

## 🌟 Q1 Rewards Earned (Community Treasury)

💰 4,812,330 ASTR  
(Staker Rewards + dApp Owner Rewards)  
🔎 [Check details on Subscan](https://astar.subscan.io/reward?address=YQnbw3oWxBju7z5CRVoq1K6JzwDaj6DNePwdc2R2fG7jdix&role=account&category=Reward&page_size=100&page=1&time_dimension=date&date_start=2026-01-01&date_end=2026-03-31)

* * *

## 🔁 ACC Membership Update

During Q1, there were changes in the Council composition:

- MouthMouth stepped down
- Gaius joined the Council  
[Community Council Update - January 2026](https://astar.subsquare.io/council/motions/67)
- zkVan & Jorge joined the Council  
[Community Council Update - February 2026](https://astar.subsquare.io/council/motions/72)

The Council would like to sincerely thank @Mouthmouth68 for his dedication, time, and valuable contributions during their time in the Astar Community Council.  
His involvement and commitment helped support the Council’s activities during a key phase of evolution for the ecosystem.

At the same time, we warmly welcome @Gaius_sama , @Vangardem , and @CJorgeSaez to the Council.  
Their experience and continued involvement in the Astar ecosystem will contribute to strengthening governance processes and supporting the next phase of growth.

Following these changes, the ACC has returned to its original structure of 6 members, ensuring a balanced and effective governance framework.

The current official ACC members are:

- Carlos
- Gaius
- SimonB
- Pitcoin
- zkVan
- Jorge

* * *

## 🎯 Looking Ahead to 2026

Astar Ambassador Fellowship (AAF) Development  
The ACC will continue refining and structuring the Astar Ambassador Fellowship, with the objective of building a scalable, transparent, and performance-driven framework for Ambassador management.  
This includes further development of task systems, evaluation criteria, and contribution tracking mechanisms to ensure that rewards are aligned with real impact on the ecosystem.

**UCG Program Transformation**  
Work will continue on the full restructuring of the UCG program, transitioning it from a bootstrapping initiative into a strategic staking actor.  
The new framework will be aligned with Tokenomics 3.0 and the updated dApp Staking model (16 slots, 2 active tiers), introducing clearer objectives, stricter entry requirements, and more structured monitoring processes.  
This transformation will also include a future rebranding of the program.

**dApp Staking Monitoring System Enhancement**  
The ACC will continue improving its monitoring framework for dApps within the dApp Staking program, focusing on building a more data-driven and efficient system to evaluate performance, activity, and ecosystem contribution over time.

**dApp Staking Framework Evolution**  
Building on the work done in Q1, the Council will continue exploring improvements to the dApp Staking system, with the goal of increasing quality standards, optimizing slot allocation, and ensuring long-term sustainability and alignment of incentives across the ecosystem.

**Governance Processes Optimization**  
The ACC will further refine its internal workflows and governance processes to improve efficiency, coordination, and decision-making speed, ensuring the Council can operate effectively as the ecosystem continues to grow.

**Continuous Documentation Improvement**  
Ongoing efforts will be dedicated to maintaining and improving both internal and public documentation, ensuring that all processes remain clear, up-to-date, and accessible to the community.

* * *

## 🙏 Closing Note

As we conclude Q1 202, the Astar Community Council would like to thank all community members, contributors, Agents, developers, and dApp teams for their continued engagement and support.6

The first quarter of 2026 has marked an important phase of restructuring and alignment for the ecosystem, with significant efforts focused on improving governance standards, refining key programs, and strengthening the overall quality of participation within Astar.

We look ahead to the coming months with a strong sense of direction and commitment, continuing to build a more efficient, transparent, and sustainable ecosystem together.

Thank you for being part of this journey — and for contributing to the growth of Astar.

—  
Astar Community Council | [@Community\_Council](https://forum.astar.network/groups/community_council)  
March 2026

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FFR23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/58956e/32.png) [@FFR23](https://forum.astar.network/u/FFR23)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 3:45pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/3 "2026-04-03T15:45:45Z")

</div>

> [@SimonB](#):
>
> Details:
> 
> | [TkSarah](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/126) | ASTR 224,107.00 |
> | --- | --- |
> | [Matt](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/131) | ASTR 189,643.00 |
> | [ZkVan](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/136) | ASTR 186,964.00 |
> | [PitCoin](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/133) | ASTR 210,714.00 |
> | [Emre](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/132) | ASTR 212,857.00 |
> | [SimonB](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/130) | ASTR 180,714.00 |
> | [EmanuCt96](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/127) | ASTR 218,214.00 |
> | [MSPY](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/129) | ASTR 153,750.00 |
> | [You425](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/128) | A |

Can you please share the metrics that justify each of the payments to ambassadors?

This inflation loophole needs to be closed.

How can we , as the community, be 100% certain that the vote for these payments is 100% unbiased?

Ambassadors and council members are all friends and have a personal relationship behind the scenes.

At the very least these votes should be public referendum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marroz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/marroz/32/5577_2.png) [@Marroz](https://forum.astar.network/u/Marroz)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 4:19pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/4 "2026-04-03T16:19:23Z")

</div>

Monstrous figures, right? Luckily the parameters have changed… It’s no longer something to worry about for the moment. We won’t be seeing those kinds of amounts again for quite a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FFR23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/58956e/32.png) [@FFR23](https://forum.astar.network/u/FFR23)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 4:55pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/5 "2026-04-03T16:55:41Z")

</div>

Crazy figures, and what a surprise that the overall ambassador forum posting numbers have fallen off a cliff since the readjustment.

I’ve seen these ambassador guys take recent pictures with some of the core team on X.

It’s a huge insulting grift to the community. They know nobody checks this forum but they can use plausible deniability that they published the results here.

We can’t even trust the Community Treasury dApp to not be greedy. The system is mirroring real life politics - people just can’t resist taking a cut / bribe when they have power.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marroz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/marroz/32/5577_2.png) [@Marroz](https://forum.astar.network/u/Marroz)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 5:38pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/6 "2026-04-03T17:38:44Z")

</div>

I know how much I’ve spent personally to push for things to change… Let’s not exaggerate with the words, I understand you, I understand your frustration, don’t misunderstand me… The year 2026 has started in a different way, let’s try to continue on this path…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pitcoin777](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/pitcoin777/32/1912_2.png) [@pitcoin777](https://forum.astar.network/u/pitcoin777)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 10:45pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/7 "2026-04-03T22:45:27Z")

</div>

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> Can you please share the metrics that justify each of the payments to ambassadors?
> 
> This inflation loophole needs to be closed.
> 
> How can we , as the community, be 100% certain that the vote for these payments is 100% unbiased?
> 
> Ambassadors and council members are all friends and have a personal relationship behind the scenes.
> 
> At the very least these votes should be public referendum.

Good evening,

1. You can verify this directly via the following link:  
[Agents Report - Astar Forum](https://forum.astar.network/c/astar-governance/agents-report/)
2. Ambassadors and council members are not here to build personal relationships. The council operates independently and acts in accordance with what is necessary for the ecosystem.
3. All motions are executed on-chain and can be independently verified here:  
[Subsquare | Astar Community Treasury Proposals](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-treasury/proposals)
4. A new Ambassador Program will be opening soon to the broader community. If you believe you can deliver meaningful contributions to the ecosystem, we strongly encourage you to apply. Let’s build Astar together.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Juminstock](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/juminstock/32/5942_2.png) [@Juminstock](https://forum.astar.network/u/Juminstock)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2026, 5:08am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/8 "2026-04-04T05:08:51Z")

</div>

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> Can you please share the metrics that justify each of the payments to ambassadors?

The metrics you are requesting do not reflect the current state of the program; however, you are free to review them in this forum by looking at previous reports and the evaluations issued by the ACC.

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> How can we , as the community, be 100% certain that the vote for these payments is 100% unbiased?

They are, provided you take into account the structure of the ACC, which is composed of the Core Team, an Ambassadors representative, and Community Members. We have maintained this structure precisely to avoid concerns like the ones being raised.

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> Ambassadors and council members are all friends and have a personal relationship behind the scenes.

Once again, the ACC is made up of different bodies within the Astar Collective, as explained above. For this reason, I ask that you refrain from making defamatory statements.

As @pitcoin777 mentioned, although we are teams that work closely together, we are not here to build personal relationships, nor do we allow that to cloud our judgment when making decisions that benefit the collective as a whole.

I invite you to catch up on this topic here: [Astar Foundation Forward: Collective Commitment to Sustainable Growth](https://forum.astar.network/t/astar-foundation-forward-collective-commitment-to-sustainable-growth/9348)

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> Crazy figures, and what a surprise that the overall ambassador forum posting numbers have fallen off a cliff since the readjustment.
> 
> I’ve seen these ambassador guys take recent pictures with some of the core team on X.
> 
> It’s a huge insulting grift to the community. They know nobody checks this forum but they can use plausible deniability that they published the results here.

It is clear that your intention is to create a space for complaints, but you lack context. As @Marroz mentioned, multiple actions were carried out in Q1 2026 to improve the ecosystem. Q2 will be a continuation of those positive efforts, along with many others.

The ACC is a body that seeks the good not only of the community, but also of the ambassadors as promoters of our ecosystem. If you do not trust its actions, which are reported quarterly (as in this thread), you are free to create a forum post proposing a better structure based on impartiality, rather than just personal opinions without supporting arguments.

We’re always happy to receive feedback with respect, always.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FFR23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/58956e/32.png) [@FFR23](https://forum.astar.network/u/FFR23)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2026, 10:58am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/9 "2026-04-04T10:58:33Z")

</div>

> [@Juminstock](#):
>
> As @pitcoin777 mentioned, although we are teams that work closely together, _we are not here to build personal relationships_, nor do we allow that to cloud our judgment when making decisions that benefit the collective as a whole.

“We are not here to build personal relationships”

Can you please explain the below post?

> <https://x.com/mr_karahanl/status/2037119047976759805?s=46>
>
> Emre @mr\_karahanl

Most importantly, i can see @Juminstock directly voted yes for @MrKarahanli-Emre to receive an Astar **payment of 212,857 ASTR** in Subsquare

[https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/132](https://astar.subsquare.io/community-council/motions/132)

 ![IMG_8015](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/plasmnet/original/2X/e/e13f63046d115fca64ebeb501554cad2ed25e063.jpeg)

 ![IMG_8016](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/plasmnet/original/2X/8/81afa66ab1667bd8e1aec63d604c168fe842699b.jpeg)

Now i want to make it clear - i am just asking for clarity on the above public posts and proposals, and not making any accusations.

I am looking for public community opinion if there is potential for a conflict of interest with the current governance system surrounding ambassadors.

Ps - to receive 200,000+ Astar during the lockdrop days you would have had to lock 10 ETH for 3 years.

In comparison, spend 5 minutes (thats all you need) to now look at the low effort evidence these ambassadors are putting forward to receive these “tips” - linked below (thanks @pitcoin777 )

> **[Agents Report](https://forum.astar.network/c/astar-governance/agents-report/38)**
>
> Everything related to the Ecosystem Agent Program in Astar onchain Governance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Juminstock](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/juminstock/32/5942_2.png) [@Juminstock](https://forum.astar.network/u/Juminstock)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/10 "2026-04-06T21:06:46Z")

</div>

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> “We are not here to build personal relationships”
> 
> Can you please explain the below post?

One thing is Astar, where I participate as a Community Manager for the Astar Foundation and as a member of the ACC, a governance body.

And something very different is my personal life, which I have nothing to explain.

If you believe I am not fulfilling the first role properly, because you think I have a bias in favor of @MrKarahanli-Emre, you are fully entitled to present your evidence and share your comments, as long as they are sufficiently substantiated.

> [@FFR23](#):
>
> Most importantly, i can see @Juminstock directly voted yes for @MrKarahanli-Emre to receive an Astar **payment of 212,857 ASTR** in Subsquare

Again, ambassador rewards are decided through onchain voting by all ACC members; this is not a decision that rests solely with me.

If you have further questions regarding ambassadors, I invite you to post in the dedicated threads or create a new one. This thread is intended for the ACC Q1 2026 update.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marroz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.astar.network/marroz/32/5577_2.png) [@Marroz](https://forum.astar.network/u/Marroz)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2026, 10:40pm UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/11 "2026-04-06T22:40:49Z")

</div>

The issue raised by the user is perfectly relevant to the discussion and to the title with which the thread was opened. There have been public remunerations and, although they are now in the past and the system has fortunately changed, they still deserve a response if requested.The other questions mentioned by the user are also pertinent, as they are perfectly in line with the ACC report: they ask for explanations precisely on the report that was drawn up. They highlight and inquire how and in what way the judging team can evaluate in a transparent and impartial manner, and award compensation, when there are evident friendly and personal relationships among its members. Nobody wants to know anyone’s private life, but when public money — everyone’s money — is being managed on behalf of all, it is right and proper to provide clear answers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FFR23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/58956e/32.png) [@FFR23](https://forum.astar.network/u/FFR23)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2026, 8:05am UTC](https://forum.astar.network/t/q1-2026-astar-community-council-update/9438/12 "2026-04-07T08:05:30Z")

</div>

> [@Juminstock](#):
>
> As @pitcoin777 mentioned, although we are teams that work closely together, we are not here to build personal relationships, nor do we allow that to cloud our judgment when making decisions that benefit the collective as a whole.

@Juminstock please note the above comment is what opened the topic up to “personal relationships” and you mention it does not “cloud your judgement”

> One thing is Astar, where I participate as a Community Manager for the Astar Foundation and as a member of the ACC, a governance body.
> 
> And something very different is my personal life, which I have nothing to explain.

But being friends with someone for 3 years and then voting on a very large Astar payment to them is a conflict of interest either directly or indirectly in a web2 company. Are the rules different here?

These are all public posts i am referring to so should be on the table for discussion despite you saying it falls under “personal life nothing to explain” (again personal life was first brought up by you)

> Again, ambassador rewards are decided through onchain voting by all ACC members; this is not a decision that rests solely with me.

Thankfully @MrKarahanli-Emre posted this picture on X as he saw an opportunity to associate with you which has allowed us to discuss this topic.

There are issues if these type of relationships exist between other ACC members who perform votes and ambassadors who then receive payments from ACC members (or did so in the past) and they do not post to social media for obvious reasons.

Thanks @Marroz for your support - we cannot leave this topic be brushed under the carpet.

@Maarten @Sota.Watanabe @sota
