I think this discussion about Tokenomics always ends up being guided by ideological aspects.
Hiring an expert for this review is a way to frame this discussion outside of that.
But I think that these adjustments (to establish a good relationship between issuance mechanisms, incentives, fees and burns) actually need a scheduled periodicity.
After all, we are in a very recent market and all movements are extremely sudden. And to continue sailing safely in these seas we need a good navigator.
A specialist like that, in my view, should not just carry out sporadic work, which is probably only noticed as necessary at a time when we already have a real problem ahead of us.
Therefore, I suggest that after making these adjustments, some form of periodic fine-tuning is established. Following the pattern of other industries. Which is the quarterly review.
In this way, we have established an operational framework that the traditional market already adopts and thus we can also be better understood by large corporations and governments, which also establish this same criterion.
If this quarterly review seems too much for Astar (due to the likely development demands it might generate), I think at the very least we should think about it each year.
But as Astar operates in the crypto market, I think that one year is like ten in other industries and we will certainly have problems generated by this speed to solve.
In the not too distant future we can think of an on the fly solution, like those adopted by airlines to adjust the price of their seats.
With Artificial Intelligence and big data we can somehow make this systemic. And in my view that would be the next step.