I agree with you. My next step is to define the list of pallets and parameters we can play around with (voting threshold, cooldown period, etc.) to explore this side.
Having said that, I also want to emphasize that governance is a community culture. We can model the behaviors in the worst-case scenario and, through game theory, incentivize the community to behave as the best actor. But if the community proposals and issues (the qualitative side of the governance) aren’t good and there isn’t enough engagement, to begin with, it’s kinda pointless. Of course, I don’t have an answer for this 