Sorry @Maarten , I didn’t understand what rules I broke. I feel like I was compliant and above all I didn’t say things that weren’t true. I’m sorry to see this way of doing things. I see that lately it is being adopted more and more often. I think I have the right to express my opinion. I also think that your personal opinion on the matter is due, I would like to read it. The fact that Sota is confident in what he does doesn’t mean that I can’t ask as a holder and investor to do something about the price. It seems logical to me that people are here asking for transparency and more action on the tokenomic side since we are in all time low. Saying sell, or that the price, or that the only thing you have to do is keep your tokens because one day they will go up, as Sota says, is not unfair and incorrect.
I expect a different action, you think I’m here to do FUD or who knows what, I have a lot of astars and my only interest is not to see the project die.
Having a great partner behind you is a plus that the foundation has not exploited to date. Do we agree on this? The holders have not benefited from this on an economic level and I am very sorry that this aspect is not taken into consideration at all, I think it is an aspect that contributes at least 50% to a project. I consider everything done on a technical level to be of a high level and I think that astar has unique characteristics.
Only today it is not attractive to the market. The trading volumes speak for themselves.
Furthermore, after months since this post was opened, we all still have not understood what the relationship between astar and sony is. The market has not appreciated it, what can we base our hope on instead? on the current state or is there something else? The Astr token to date has no real utility other than that of lending liquidity to the soneium ecosystem, can you please share something about astar evolution 2?
Thinking about the speculative state of the project, which is not everything, but is equally important, I think 2 things, either this project will not be profitable or a few people, who have information that the masses do not have today will benefit from this.
In my opinion, defining this as rewarding for those who believed in it is not correct, because the current state and the information in our possession are not enough to put the blame on us holders.
I understand that you have to work, but what does it cost you to share something and give greater hope to those who have supported your work financially for years? Thank you.