Hello everybody !
I created this post in response to comments by @moonme on another post that I found very interesting. To sum up, he expresses the fact that according to him several projects have failed, winning quite a lot of rewards for, in the end, not building much. I won’t give any opinion on this specific point, because I don’t know the objectives of these different projects, what they did or not. However, these discussions have raised a question in me, probably very naive but I still want to ask you :
Why Astar doesn’t hire more people to form his own teams in order to create more “in-house” products?
For me, having a common structure makes it possible to have more efficiency, better ressources management, and that does not prevent working with creative and talented people.
In my idea, we should keep the excellent dapp staking system, the only thing that changes is that the majority (at the begining! ) of the projects are carried out by Astar teams. For example, I can decide to stack my ASTR on the RD team, or on the one that builds an NFT’s platform, or even the one in charge of a DEFi protocol, etc.
And as it’s primordial to continue to allow external teams to build on the ecosystem, because that’s ultimately the reason for being of Astar Network, we give them the opportunity to be listed, but we will only select the 4-5 most promising projects per year. The idea is that during Astar’s early years which are the most delicate, we control the resources better to be sure that the money is used in the best way.
Over time, other innovative projects will join the ecosystem and the balance between Astar teams and external teams will be reversed. The Astar teams will have given the impetus which will make future talents want to développ their projects on the network and make Astar in a few years the real hub for dapps, the one we are waiting for.
Now I can already hear some people telling me that this is heading towards more centralization and that we don’t want it. I understand it, but personally I prefer a little more centralization at the start and then detach from it, than betting everything from the begining on external projects who may never reach their goals and which thus waste time, energy and money for the entire ecosystem.
That’s probably a very naive vision of the thing, I’m only a modest retail investor you know, but I wonder if relying so much on external teams is not a little too risky, at least in the early years of a young ecosystem.
Thanks for reading folks, this is only a external vision of a guy who is not in the team, who therefore does not have all the data. I don’t pretend to have the answers, I only ask myself questions and give some food for thought.
I wish you a very Happy Easter!
MF