The amount of knowledge required depends on the type of NFT you want to create.
If you just want to issue NFTs, for example, you can easily create them using a platform that allows you to issue NFTs, such as Opena, or you can use a launch pad such as Sonova for Astar or Soneium (although this will create some business hurdles). ).
If you want to be more practical and create it with your own contract, you can create an NFT relatively easily using a tool like Hardhat for a typical EVM chain.
Importantly, NFT is a means, not an end. The same is true of technology in general. What you want to do with NFT is more important than what you can do with NFT.
However, it is difficult to think that way from the beginning. As you are asking here, it would be difficult to use NFT as a means to an end without first knowing what can be achieved by NFT.
NFTs and tokens are ultimately expressed as âon-chained rightsâ. In other words, anything that can be achieved through the exercise of rights can be done if you want to do it. The only question now is how far to go on-chain. Of course, the less the on-chain element, the more trust is required, and the less good the blockchain is.
What attracts the average user to NFT is âwhat rights do I get? If you own it, you may have the right to sell it, you may have the right to join some community, you may have the right to use the IP. There is also the right to satisfy the desire to own the simplest of things. Whatever it is, I think it will be important to give the user the rights they want.
Thank you for letting me know more about NFT.
Iâm currently at the stage where Iâm interested in NFTs, so Iâd like to plan how to use them based on the âpurposeâ of encouraging large numbers of people to participate in the forum.
What I can imagine at the moment is
ă»Things that satisfy the desire to own
ă»Things that give you the right to speak
ă»Things that give you the right to vote
etc.
I think that if we can link that NFT to a personal account, we can expect a responsible discussion.
Iâm an amateur at creating NFTs, so Iâd like to try my hand at it while learning.
I think it will take some time for the plan to become concrete, but this is also something Iâm looking forward to.
I have benefited from great free and open source software such as JW_CAD and Linux.
i respect that idea.
I canât expect big results like JW_CAD from what Iâm doing, but with this NFT, I want to create a project for the masses rather than pursuing profit.
However, I lack the knowledge and skills.
I would like to deepen my understanding of NFT and research how it can be useful.
The purpose is for many people to participate in the Astar Forum, so I think there are other ways to do so without using NFT.
I think it would be great if we could actively cooperate with that goal.
Thanks to your proposal, weâre having a very lively discussion. I just finished reading all the threads, and they were incredibly insightful. Iâm looking forward to hearing your ideas!
As for what satisfies the desire for ownership, I think the art and PFP types would be the easiest since they are collection item type NFTs.
Those that grant the right to speak and vote are what are called âtoken gates. Token gates give you authority on the platform by holding certain tokens (including NFTs).
It is easy to understand the image of NFTs substituting for the role of roles in Discord.
Currently Forum does not have an on-chain element, so if you want to add this functionality, you will have to create a new platform or use an existing token-gate enabled platform.
For example, Guild.xyz can be integrated with Discord to automatically assign roles to accounts holding specific NFTs, allowing for specific permissions and adding icons next to their names (Icons need to be raised to the server level to be added).
Since creating your own platform is a hurdle, you may want to make good use of existing platforms.
Certainly this is one of the big problems of participation in the forum, I add that the teams should present themselves, and then to grow their communities, they can present the work plan would be devised to have good feebdback on the forum, I know that this would depend on each team is just my perception, but ultimately the projects should make a good marketing that promotes your project and in turn to Astar and consequently invite your community and other communities to participate in your thread on the forum, IMO!
Your proposal is full of considerate suggestions in improving the engagement score, but it has some obstacles up ahead. The mobile voting feature, notification, and rewarding the users with the $ASTR token will need great design effort, orchestrating, and acceptance both from the core team and the community. This will be a challenge, especially in bridging the gaps among stakeholders for whom technical expertise may vary. The road to creating an intuitive app may be rather difficult since decentralized environments are not exactly that straightforward.
The idea is full of potential, but the implementation will be challenging, especially taking into consideration all possible technical and operational hurdles. Youâre right to seek collaboration, since this is going to be the breaking point.
I think the essence is to bridge the gap between the core team and general stakeholders.
That is very difficult.
Perhaps if the CEO says something useful and the price rises, it may be easy, although it is not essential.
However, what I am saying is not an eternal theme such as âeliminating discrimination from humanityâ.
I donât think it can be solved by simply implementing a solution, but there are some things you canât know until you try.
For people like me who are not well informed, in order to understand WEB3, you need to go through the process of thinking about what you can do with web3.
I think it is very meaningful to explore how to use NFTs and blockchain.
I feel that the goal is not to create an app or move NFTs, but to get people interested in WEB3.
I think that the basic solution can be solved by actual communication.
It may seem like a roundabout way, but the shortest route to a solution may be for agents to communicate diligently.
I donât think that alone will make it more meaningful to promote web3.
I am not working at the moment, but I will return to architecture soon. I would like to make progress little by little while working in architecture.
I need some more time to decide what I can and canât do myself.
Once I can make that judgment, Iâd like to be able to decide whether or not to outsource.
I made the suggestion but I felt there were some concerns, so hearing your opinions confirmed my concerns.
The focus of the discussion is to stimulate discussion and voting in the Astar Forum, and we hope that the communityâs communication will be evaluated with the correct understanding.
Itâs great that the environment improves with UI improvements.
Market conditions are always changing
We were recruiting people to participate in the forum until yesterday, but from tomorrow demand will suddenly increase and the number of participants will increase significantly, so it is easy to imagine that we will be forced to take unexpected measures.
But itâs hard to imagine when that will happen.
I think that wave is approaching, at least as of the time I am participating in the forum.
I imagine there will be a lot of friction as mass adoption progresses.
However, I believe that the act of deepening understanding and recognition is forever important.
I hope that this will be a forum where not only a few people but many people involved can come to a common understanding.
I would like to move forward while thinking about what is necessary for that purpose.
