You should improve your attitude on the forum. There are no “stupid” questions — the participants in this discussion will be the ones voting on your public proposal. If you’re unable to clearly explain your project or respond constructively to questions, it’s unlikely they will vote to approve your grant request.
From my side, your proposal is missing some very basic information:
- Game concept: What is the game about? Can you provide an overview or examples of similar games we can compare it to?
- Fractal RED: This is the first time I’m hearing about it. Looking at the other NEET topic on the forum, this was not included in the UCG milestones or the original roadmap. Why did you decide to pivot and build this game instead? What about the other promised milestones and projects, such as your DEX?
- Astar relationship: Beyond the “potential” in-game marketplace transactions, how does this proposal add real value to the Astar ecosystem? Am I correct in assuming this means accepting ASTR as a currency in your marketplace on Soneium?
- Funding logic: If the game is built on Soneium, why should Astar fund it? Do you have other sources of funding or revenue from the Soneium ecosystem, or are you relying solely on the Astar Treasury?
I’m not against funding and supporting teams building new on-chain products connected to Astar. However, this proposal feels like it came out of nowhere and lacks the fundamental details needed to understand the bigger picture of what you’re building. Since token holders will vote based on the information provided here, I strongly encourage you to clarify these points and take the time to answer questions before rushing into the on-chain governance process.