Hello @you425, thank you for raising these important structural questions.
They will always be able to apply again in the future, as long as they meet the new entry point criteria for dApp Staking.
This is something the ACC is not aware of and is not a concern for us at the moment.
Now, specifically regarding the point you mentioned here, it is valid to consider that the Community Treasury remaining in the list of 16 could be perceived as unfair if we have other promising dApps. However, we must keep in mind that the new model aims to prioritize dApps that generate real value for the ecosystem.
The Community Treasury has funds that are primarily used for:
- UCG Program (which is currently evolving)
- Ambassador Compensation
- Community proposals or activities
This directly benefits our community, and considering that the ACC is internally discussing an evolution for UCG that will benefit other dApps, the value this dApp provides is clear.
However, we are always open to different opinions, so we will be attentive if this is perceived differently. 