Proposal: Control of active Dapps

Hello @Zorounashi I can understand Your point due to the recent VLS announcement but I think asking to check every individual dApp is wrong. Many of them have totally different purposes and do not necessarily rely on users activity , examples are :

  • Talisman (wallet provider)
  • OnFinality (blockchain infrastructure platform)
  • Kekkai (web3.0 anti-fraud security checker)
  • keyvault (A blockchain-based password manager) and many more

The tier system still needs to be optimized but even removing all not active dApps will not impact that much the rewards for developers. In my opinion Astar should just focus more on bringing more interested developers to the eco and we cannot disagree with the fact in the recent months Astar start to have A LOT of interesting partnerships with development focused platforms.

https://astar.network/blog/chainide-for-astar:-development-game-changer-40331

Just to conclude and don’t move off topic we already have a planned governance improvement to solve these issues and I recommend to read this proposal to check which are the future developments for the dApp staking management and dApps activity checking :slight_smile:

1 Like