@FFR23 Additionally, I would like to mention that no scam projects have emerged from the Astar ecosystem in the last two years. The biggest reason for this is the valuable Astar ambassadors, who you think are centralized but are actually deeply focused on decentralization
In my opinion scam project does not come down to bad intentions. A project that stops developing for whatever reason i would consider a scam.
My very first post in this forum bro - linked below.
Now look at their X profile, no tweet since May
This was obvious to me, yet look at all the ambassadors who voted yes to list, even some guaranteeing their behavior. I was the only one critical in there.
I am sure if someone cared to look hard enough at all the dApps who don’t have enough Astar staked to them, you will find a few dead projects who have stopped developing on Astar but remain listed.
But AOC get delisted for being vocal with fair honest feedback - very unfair in my opinion. (my last comment on that topic as i know the admins want it in a separate thread but i feel it relevant for my point here).
Edit: @Leo I find it naive that you are so quick to defend every project currently on Astar when you have no idea what their intentions are behind the scenes. You are putting your word on the line by saying “rest assured” and it loses meaning when you have no knowledge of the facts or ways to verify. Your hands are very full at NL as you have stated so how can you confirm for other projects or ambassadors? Just more arrogance and hubris to think otherwise.
Rest assured, the Astar community is more independent, impartial, and decentralized than CD. Additionally, you mentioned that governance is not much discussed, but in the two articles I wrote, many people have started to learn about this governance.
Best Regards to CD
No idea what you are talking about but thanks for showing a glimpse of your unhinged behavior for all to see.
Again, i don’t see your logic for being against implementing additional controls for ambassadors.