Hi @pithecus, thanks for your questions. I have already answered some of them in the forum, but I’ll reply back to you for clarity.
- Although new and exisiting developers all can apply for the UCG program, the team having ample experiences should be able to deply their dApp for contributing to Astar Network growth; hence, personally I think dApp staking is more suitable in this case. And the current voting seems to show the community sentiment toward this application, as majority voters (in the top 20) seem negative now.
Thank you for your understanding. I don’t understand your intention of choosing the top 20, but the majority of voters and the number of votes are YES.
- Sharing only the current TVLs might be too simple to devlier the message. Over more than two years of activities from the three dApps you have deployed, the ATH TVLs were marked in the early 2022 and kept being reduced regardless of the market condition, compared to, for example, Algem. So I am concerned if this time is completely different from what you were experiencing so far, and if you think if it is the case, then it would be great to be detailed here to clear this concern.
First of all, LST, Lending, Stable DEX, and Yield Optimizer are completely different. In the case of LST, there is a relatively strong incentive to deposit because the rewards depend on Astar’s dApp staking rewards.
Regarding Algem, as you mentioned, the TVL has hardly increased based on the amount of ASTR since May 2023. This is likely because people who deposited have left their assets there, resulting in very little inflow. After accumulating TVL, we plan to optimize the adoption of dApp staking and further build DeFi legos to maximize incentives. Additionally, through the milestones mentioned above, we plan to approach both within and outside the Astar Network.
- On top of it, you mentioned that you benchmarked and drew the target percentage of 8% at the end of this year. And the targeted 8% (36m) already exceeded the current total DeFi TVL on Astar Network, according to DefiLlama, and even higher than Algem’s current TVL (14m), though it could be achievable at the end of this year.
If you say it is “just” a number you mentioned and it can change accordinging to market conditions, then I suggest you to share more detailed target numbers and reasons in the coming months (at least more than 4 months for the UCG program period in case accepted) under the worst/moderate/best market conditions. And those numbers should be referenced to evaluate the achievement over the UCG program period.
We will do our best to achieve our goals, but we feel that your suggestion is a bit unfair. I recall that the purpose of UCG is to provide opportunities for both new and existing developers with new protocols. Detailed TVL plans beyond three months and those numbers to be referenced to evaluate the achievement over the UCG program period are not required.
What you are asking for is equivalent to demanding specific TVL or revenue figures from a pre-seed startup. This level of requirement is usually expected from Series A companies with some historical revenue. It’s extremely difficult to create detailed projections and actual numbers without past data.
I have also reviewed other UCG grants, and none have been asked to provide such detailed information. We believe we have provided more information, including a roadmap, than other dApps. Did you ask the same from other dApps in the UCG proposal? If so, did you obtain the following information you mentioned below? If so, please share it with us. We’ll consider adding the numbers to be evaluated in the UCG period then.
“At least more than 4 months for the UCG program period in case accepted under the worst/moderate/best market conditions. And those numbers should be referenced to evaluate the achievement over the UCG program period.”
- I happened to see the GitHub activities for the three dApps, but I was not able to find major commits since the last commits in 2022. So it would be great if you can clarify or share detailed plan to develop Neemo Finance on Astar EVM. As it is unique and different from the other three, there must be major commits and developments from the Neemo Finance.
As I have mentioned repeatedly, most of Neemo’s members are not part of the Starlay team. Also we do not want to mix discussions about Starlay with those about Neemo, but you can see the relevant information by looking at Starlay’s details. Medium might be a useful reference for you (Starlay Finance – Medium). Even after 2022, Starlay have continued development on Wasm, mobile support, leveraged staking, and expansion to other chains. Starlay is still active beyond 2022, and this can be verified on GitHub as well.
Regarding Neemo’s development, we have already documented the development details and roadmap. Could you please review them?
- In this response, if I am not mistaken, Starlay, Kagla, and Muuu are the dApps on your team, so the only ongoing discussion in the ecosystem is with Arthswap. But I am not sure if this is because of unavailability to disclose more details. In any case, it would be really great if further discussions are also on the way with other DeFi protocols on Astar EVM.
Again as I have mentioned repeatedly, most of Neemo’s members are not part of the Starlay team. Therefore, Starlay, Kagla, and Muuu are not the dApps on our team and need to discuss with each of protocols. Furthermore, in the case of Starlay, there is a governance system, so decisions cannot be made solely at my discretion. As I mentioned, we are making preparations for partnerships, which include other protocols on AstarEVM.