If the Community Council’s dapps evaluation work well, won’t this problem be solved?
And since there were voices saying that it wasn’t working well in the Japanese community, we proposed a mechanism to track DApp development progress and marketing indicators.
Isn’t the problem not DApp staking itself, but the lack of a mechanism to track DApp development progress and marketing indicators?
What do you think about the issue that the Community Treasury and Astar Core Contributor remain Tier 1 and do not function as developer support?
In the end, UCG is just the Community Council handing out money collected from dapp stakers, which I don’t think is healthy.
It’s similar to how governments collect taxes and hand out subsidies.
Don’t you think the money raised by dapp stakers should go directly to developers?
If the core team can build great developer support features beyond dapp staking, I would support the restructuring, but the important thing here is that the core team probably doesn’t have any concrete ideas for them right now.
At least, no specific specifications have been stated.
This is not related to Sony, so there is no need to hide it.