I think we can use some variables here:
This is very good information. It should help users get a clearer overall picture. If I may, I’d like to consult with you a bit further:
Regarding the tab of dApp Ranking During Build&Earn Subperiod data, I think it’s excellent. It would be even better if we could add information on the % sharing for each item, which might make it easier to understand.
Following point 1, in terms of tiers or ranks, it might raise questions for users. If we had an explanation, it could help users understand better.
Thank you for the promptly organized information.
It seems that we will indeed be able to gather interesting data as the period progresses.
Thank you for your comment.
Numerical data, when there are many numbers, means a large quantity. But from a data perspective, it becomes significant when compared to something else, such as comparing to the total amount in percentages. Because the maximum is 100%, it can effectively convey that something is truly abundant.
Okay, I understand. I’m trying to share from the perspective of new users who might not understand what this is. Perhaps an explanation would help them understand better.
However, all of this is just an initial idea. The information you have is already good as it is. =)
Hi @BoomBLB,
- Regarding the tab of dApp Ranking During Build&Earn Subperiod data, I think it’s excellent. It would be even better if we could add information on the % sharing for each item, which might make it easier to understand.
Regarding this point, you are right. This “dApp Ranking During Build&Earn Subperiod” page simply shows the rankings. The Astar Portal serves as a complementary role because it does not provide an instant overview.
However, your message lacks specificity. There are patterns such as the staking ratio of each dApp across all dApps or the staking amount ratio per staker for each dApp. By the way, both are feasible and have already been implemented, although they are not displayed on this page.
The former is displayed during the Voting Period (on the “dApp Ranking During Voting Subperiod” page). The latter is represented on the “Staking Amount by dApp Staker” page.
By the way, I have a certain level of knowledge and skills in statistics. Do you know “R” or “R Studio”? Recently, I posted something like the following on X. This graph alone is abstract, but if you add basic statistical information, you can see the distribution of how much each staker is staking in each dApp.
If you are going to add expressions, I think it would be good to provide some insights for stakers and dApp projects. If you come up with any specific indicators like that, please let me know.
Thank you.
That’s great. I don’t have any expertise in technical matters or statistics at all. I’m sure your skills are definitely better than mine. Anyway, thank you very much for helping to explain further. I’ve learned a lot more. =)
Hi @tksarah , I also am very impressed for the dAppstaking data you provide on your website.
I noticed that If the features @defiguy mentioned above are traceable in some way, then those might be beneficial for the offchain governance (see Astar Townhall - Offchain Governance - #43 by pithecus), if it is possible to give weights for those who have regular onchain activities, though nothing is discussed yet.
Hi @pithecus ,
Thank you for your comment.
Yes, some of the suggestions he made are feasible.
I wish I had more time to code them thoroughly, but I have added them to my backlog.
Hi Community,
I updated this page yesterday.
Previously, there were requests from the community regarding a Japanese NFT project, so I prioritized that. (By the way, this project has decided to collaborate on Soneium.)
Recently, the API was updated, making it easier to implement, so I have updated the “Staking Amount by dApp Staker” page.
Nov.21 2024 EVM (e.g., Metamask) addresses are now displayed. The following information is available.
・You can see the addresses staked with EVM [ (Staker/EVM) ] column.
・You can see the native addresses of those staked with EVM [ (Staker/Native) ] column.
・For those staked natively, the [ (Staker/EVM) ] column shows “N/A”.
This update allows you to check how much is being staked per project and per user and identify those addresses. Previously, only Astar Native addresses were available, but now you can also see the addresses staked with EVM.
Thanks,
