Thank you for creating the voting.
In the voting we are requesting ASTR based on the calculations as you originally suggested, is this correct?
If we calculate it at the current amount, we will be short by about 3200 ASTR.
Wouldn’t it be better to keep the billing in dollars and have the ASTR sent at the price at the time of remittance, as discussed in this proposal?
Hi You, thanks for the comment.
In fact I made the request in dollars, just as we had discussed here in the forum. I put the $ASTR amount only as a reference, that’s why I put it as the second item.
Do you think I should remove it to avoid confusion?
Yes, looking at the Townhall content only, it appears that you are requesting an ASTR.
Given that we are in the voting stage, I think the content should clearly reflect what we have discussed here.
I think it would be less confusing to clearly state that the ASTRs listed now are for reference only, and that the ASTRs are calculated according to the price at the time of remittance and then charged on top of the surplus for the price fluctuation measures.
Thanks for the comment, you. I have already removed the entry for the requested $ASTR amount from the forum post and posted a message on Townhall indicating this we discussed 
Thank you, I have voted!
Hello there! Thanks eveyone to participate in the voting and discussion sessions, that helps us to improve our treasury management.
@Gaius_sama here is my wallet:
ZJKp9fuuQihYopwLEmxZ55zU5WMpeXi95HAPRPUiGcZgZQz
Hello @Juminstock
Congratulations on your proposal being approved by the community! 
The retro funding amount requested has been executed and transferred from the Community Treasury: