Hi there,
Thanks for your patience on this proposal and sharing the detailed milestone documentation.
I’ve reviewed the content and verified the on-chain contracts for the NFTs and associated RMRK components, it’s clear that Milestone 1 was technically delivered with visible, verifiable work.
From my side, I’m open to considering this Milestone 1 payment as a valid retroactive grant. I’ll bring it to the other Main Council members for formal evaluation so the review process can begin and your work can move forward.
That said, I’d like to raise a few important points before we proceed further:
1. Activity and Follow-up
It’s been about a month since this discussion opened, and there hasn’t been much movement since.
Could you share what has happened during this time, any updates on gameplay integration, additional development, testing progress, or preparations for the next milestone?
Understanding what you’ve accomplished since the initial submission will help the Council gauge ongoing momentum.
2. Playability & On-Chain Deployment
The contract work is a solid foundation, but the Council will only be able to fully assess quality, performance, and player experience once the game is live or at least playable on Astar.
Please clarify your expected timeline for a public or closed testing release so we can plan evaluation accordingly.
3. Go-to-Market, Business Model & Adoption Metrics
Before we can support future milestones, we’ll need clearer visibility on:
- Go-to-Market strategy – how do you plan to attract and onboard players, through marketing, partnerships, or a launch plan? You mentioned the NFT Bridge community as an option, but the proposal doesn’t give much visibility into that community, its size, level of engagement, or motivation.
- Business model – how the game will sustain itself beyond treasury grants (NFT sales, royalties, DAO revenue, or marketplace activity).
- User acquisition & retention KPIs – measurable goals such as number of active wallets, NFTs minted, returning players, or share of NFT Bridges users joining Astar.
At the moment, these elements are not defined, which makes it difficult to evaluate the project’s ecosystem impact and long-term value to Astar.
4. NFT Bridges Community
Since the upcoming milestones rely heavily on integration with NFT Bridges, it would help to have metrics or stats about that community:
- Number of NFT holders
- Current activity level or DAO participation
- Expected onboarding target to Astar
This information will help us measure how effectively the partnership contributes to user growth.
5. Next Steps
To summarize my position:
- I recognize and appreciate the technical work completed for Milestone 1.
- I’ll bring this to the other Council members for collective review and discussion on releasing the payment.
- I encourage SFY Labs to provide a short progress update, GTM/business plan outline, and expected launch schedule to help us evaluate the broader picture before moving into Milestone 2.
Appreciate the effort put into this so far, it’s encouraging to see Astar-native gaming projects leveraging RMRK and cross-chain logic.
With stronger visibility on adoption and sustainability, this could become a solid example of a well-executed treasury-backed initiative.
Looking forward to your update and to continued collaboration.
Gaius_sama
Astar Main Council 