Some valid questions have been raised about your project. While we’ll moderate any false accusations or toxic comments (according to the new rules of engagement), that doesn’t mean you can ignore legitimate questions from ASTR holders. Given your project has been heavily doing marketing around dApp Staking, received decent support from stakers, and been part of the program for a while now, it’s totally fair for the community to ask for some clarity.
The above comment is from @Gaius_sama in the DeStore de-listing thread…
So @Leo responds to @sota and everyone here, promising to finally address the concerns around his project, he gives a deadline of 24 hours which he then breaks…and now he is just straight up refusing to answer?
When @knacker65 and the Skylabs team were asked questions - they showed full transparency…and their reward is being (more than likely looking at the poll results) delisted as a result.
Now Neurolanche are being protected from scrutiny…why? @Maarten
The precedent has been set with Skylabs - if projects don’t offer (reasonable) transparency or address legitimate and founded concerns, they should automatically be delisted (imo).
If they offer transparency and the results arn’t satisfactory - then they face the vote.
DeStore are also answering the scrutiny in the other thread. Why are NL being given a free pass?
What more can we as a community do in regards this topic, when we are just stone walled at every turn.
The core team desperately want to increase voter turn out and increase participation here - well don’t let our concerns continue to fall on deaf ears.