Thanks for the tool @VasaKing it was very useful.
this is the onchain information about skylab staking
Out of 30 million in stake, almost the same amount for 15 months, there are only 2 addresses that have put 29 million astar in stake.
I think the onchain analysis doesn’t lie right?
Now, assuming that everyone does what they want, if the @Zorounashi analyses are real, the famous 11 points that start from the assumption that a few people have hidden and made sure that this team is still listed while others, many others were first punished and then delisted for much less, WHEN YOU DISCOVER THAT THE TOTAL OF STAKERS is made up of 2 people, how do you think the management of this dapp should be evaluated? Is everything normal and decentralized? Do we want to do a search on these 2 accounts Marteen? 
You talk very often about collaboration…NOT TOXICITY.
You are the ones who poisoned this place.
The SFY team has nothing to declare or prove, we are out of dapp staking and we know why.
We want answers now on the status not only of the skylab team but also of all those who are still out of regulation today.
The skylab team is not our target, we don’t care about their activities. We have nothing to clarify with them.
I repeat all the point still not answered, so that those who read below will not be fooled by this terrible attempt to place all the blame on SFY.
1)the dapp has never developed or invested in research despite the large funds obtained in 15 months from its listing, on the integration of astr blockchain as required by the currently applicable legislation. This is the point that should lead to the delist as it is NOT DAPP, not a trivial point to discuss or verify by voting(You vote the main rules?)
The greatest lack of respect is not that of the team, which is right to take all the time possible and to earn as much as possible with the minimum possible expense, but of the people who should control this according to the regulations, namely the ambassadors. The rules must be respected and in theory there is no vote that should be done, there is no discussion on this. The core team or whoever performs this function should have long ago brought this shortcoming to light. They are supported by a member of the core team, the same one who closed the thread about their poor development, namely Ramz, who is the same one who supports them unconditionally, out of friendship or otherwise, I don’t care. There would be nothing wrong with that team developing according to the rules and not taking advantage that other teams were not granted (RIGHTLY)
2)They have always said that developing a game takes time, very true. It is not true that you have to pass off assets purchased on third-party markets as yours, and use them as the main purpose of development. They exploit people’s ignorance in terms of “game development” to make people believe that everything they are doing is the result of enormous sacrifices, instead the first person who questioned all this brought to light with simple research and experience that the team usually merged and packaged existing things. In some cases there is nothing wrong with buying assets or AI to generate assets, but this cannot be the main product and especially in their case it cannot be, having in fact always used these assets as an “excuse” for not being able to work on YET blockchain integration. 3) They have been in UCG for the longest time possible (2 times) and never reported what they were doing in a timely manner (because there was nothing to report, just read the forum) and none of the ambassadors asked anything about it. Ucg provides for the use of milestones, have the milestones been reached? OF COURSE NOT.
They have their backs covered, so much so that they were even still in the UCG section after more than a year. without receiving extra found, but having better exposure.
- They sold through Yoki additional nfts obviously generated with AI, in the best period of ASTAR (in value) cashing in a considerable amount, obviously without taking care of their integration into the game, they haven’t even decided yet which network to use, let alone choose where to mint these useless images… other assets generated with AI that will not have a sequel, and which have never been talked about again. This is always thanks to influential friends. I think that even in this case community funds were spent, and that many people in the moment of enthusiasm and rise of the astar token trusted to buy any capsule existing on the market even from the skylab team.
On every nfts it’s write: it could unlock future rewards.
real utility? none, still more promises. Who knows how long it will take here too.
They professed a knowledge of the RMRK protocols that in reality they do not have. They are simple users of a simplified website for the mint, in fact when the rmrk team updated their protocols and made the minting of nft 2.0 via the website impossible, they no longer did what they had in mind, because in their team despite having raised thousands of dollars in the last year, they do not have a blockchain developer. They rely on the Tricky team occasionally apparently. To date the results are poor even for the migrations they proposed.
There are only 6 nfts migrated. That’s all. 
The migrated assets are not equippable, and it is not clear why, if not for technical lack. To avoid trouble they set the migration deadline in a few days and did everything manually. Many people evidently do not know anything and for them that is fine.
- They tried in the only answers provided on why there was no integration with astar after 15 months of dappstaking, to associate the migration of other assets, to the blockchain product of the skylab game. An attempt to evade the question on which other people then fossilized, trying to bring attention to this thing. This is a minor thing, that has nothing to do with the game. I hope it is clear to everyone, in any case it was not completed as planned.
- They talk about SONEIUM but forget that their integration will have to (if they follow what was proposed in the first proposal) also pass through the work of the RMRK team. There is currently no marketplace, nor will there be in the coming months, that can guarantee the correct buying and selling or even just the correct viewing of nfts 2.0 if not that of Singular. I am not even obviously hypothesizing their own marketplace, they clearly would not know where to put their hands, if they do not know how to do a migration, so that said, how can you be sure to develop this with the rmrk protocol? Mystery.
- They have never paid the stakers for what was promised. The airdrops were not carried out as they should have been, also helped by the poor participation of people in the ecosystem, in fact to date one of the biggest shortcomings of astar is precisely that of having a dappstaking where no one can lose anything even by betting and trusting certain scams. This makes the complaint of the end user almost excessive… in the meantime they have positioned themselves in a certain place and tier also thanks to those promises.
Optional:
9) They do not have a github on which users or anyone interested can see the progress of the team. All the teams that actually develop something have public code, since after 15 months we are not yet talking about the blockchain product, which does not mean talking about the finished game but at least a phantom application of the protocol to it, it would be appropriate to have a dedicated github page.
Strange:
10) For more than a year they have always had the same amount of tokens in staking, the figure does not go up or down, clearly this makes you think about many things, the vote of a few, the support of influential people, which explain many things including the lack of control and the freedom to do whatever they want without being punished.
This rhymes with centralization. (The answer is above, two accounts finance the dapp, despite the numbers and what the skylab team has always said.)
To investigate:
11) If as admitted they delegated and purchased things with the funds received, while people believed that they were the main creators, including graphic assets and marketing assets such as music by the Japanese artist and more, this project was born practically as an empty box, made of promises and beautiful images. First the funds are collected and then savings are delegated. Everyone could create dapps in this way, and the background or what was built by serious teams would be something insignificant.
How will copyright be managed in this case? No answer on this again. We are really at risk that the game could be created from assets that cannot be used in the context in which it will be distributed, and this on Soneium is a big problem as well as a huge embarrassment if it were to happen.
These questions were asked 2 months ago. The answers were non-existent and almost ridiculous for a team that is building a web3 game, there were statements that suggest in many cases a very high incompetence and that they do not know what they are doing. This could explain why 15 months have passed.
The 30 million coming from 2 accounts for all 15 months despite new voting systems and build & earn instead explain something completely different.
The dapp according to the current regulation cannot be listed and it should not be an onchain vote to establish this. The Astar team through the words of Marteen is trying to make this weight fall on the shoulders of SFY Labs by asking them to start a delist vote. The Astar core team has always acted without compromise in the event of a certain break in the main regulation, today they are trying to find an amicable solution.
From the latest things written and the slow mode suddenly activated, Marteen seems to be ready to close the current post, silence those who are asking for answers and probably also ban our team or those like him who ask for answers.
The SFY team also asks if it is possible that both the ambassadors and the core team currently involved in this discussion, give an example of behavior and that they publicly clarify WHAT ARE THE RULES FOR BEING LISTED AND RECEIVING REWARDS and if SKYLAB is in a right or wrong position.
A non-response is a clear sign of collusion (with one of the two parties) and is not something that can be defined as democratic or fair.
Good luck to everyone.