I totally agree with you!
Soon we can see the dAppStaking v3 in Shibuya-testnet.
I think this is not enough to solve the problem now, but only the way to solve it fairly.
So, Iām keep watching and participating this test to improve it.
Itās peopleās choise, always.
No further development means no buidling. So, in the first place you should voluntarily ask to delist from dApp staking.
This is what the dev from Open Emoji Battler did. He was humble enough to admit that he wonāt be developing any further, therefore requested to delist from dApp staking. You can find the conversation on ShidenDao discord.
Itās an interesting question: should dApp staking continue once project development is complete, even if the project has all functionality in place?
Another question arises: if dApp staking helps a project in its early stages to achieve significance, and eventually, the project establishes a solid business model for independent revenue generation, should dApp staking continue for this project even in the presence of continuous development?
Do we have specific rules in place when the community approves proposals to include a project in dApp staking?
These questions are really important, and I emphasize the value of seeking concrete answers to them.
The dApp staking program is based on a philosophy that contributes to active projects. With the dApp staking model, our goal should be to enhance and add value to the Astar Networkās brand. When someone states they have already completed developments, it indicates they do not wish to spend more time at Astar. Projects should remember that these rewards belong to the community, and they earned these tokens to add value to the Astar Network.
I fully support the delisting of Sirius Finance.
When the development is stopped, there is no reason for being listed in dApp staking.
I agree with the othersā opinions. DApp Staking should indeed drive development; if it fails to do so, delisting should be considered.
The discussion period is coming to an end and itās time to start the voting, which will last 5 days.
- Delist Sirius Finance from dApp Staking
- Not delist Sirius Finance from dApp Staking
All forum members with a minimum Trust Level of 2 can take part in this vote.
Cast your vote wisely!
Voted AYE, same reason as my previous comment.
Voted YES, a build to earn program is no longer relevant for a team who has stopped to build.
I donāt think Sirius Finance is the first or last dApp talked about delisting. I would much rather see similar actions taken by the Arthswap team.
The Sirius team is certainly not active on the various social networks and I donāt think it is advantageous for Astar to have similar dApps on the portal.
However, I vote No for delisting because I would like to see the fruit of the hard work done by the team on the staking model of the dApp.
I voted Yes to delist them because I donāt see why Sirius Finance should remain in dApp Staking if theyāre no longer building or working on Astar.
I am Supporting to delist! If you are not building anymore, you donāt need dapp staking.
Voted aye for this proposal.
My vote is Yes, I think the team wanted to justify their bad streak by the dumpeo of their token in an exchange, which is difficult to prove, their justifications are not credible.
Iāve already made my thoughts known.
I said I support the launch of this project.
Iām still in favour of it.
I vote to Delist. I donāt see any reason to keep them in our Portal.
I voted AYE. I think for so long now the team hasnāt made any significant contribution to grow the product and, or add value to the Astar ecosystem.
I think it is important that the team keep building and adding value to the Astar eco