The metrics you are requesting do not reflect the current state of the program; however, you are free to review them in this forum by looking at previous reports and the evaluations issued by the ACC.
They are, provided you take into account the structure of the ACC, which is composed of the Core Team, an Ambassadors representative, and Community Members. We have maintained this structure precisely to avoid concerns like the ones being raised.
Once again, the ACC is made up of different bodies within the Astar Collective, as explained above. For this reason, I ask that you refrain from making defamatory statements.
As @pitcoin777 mentioned, although we are teams that work closely together, we are not here to build personal relationships, nor do we allow that to cloud our judgment when making decisions that benefit the collective as a whole.
I invite you to catch up on this topic here: Astar Foundation Forward: Collective Commitment to Sustainable Growth
It is clear that your intention is to create a space for complaints, but you lack context. As @Marroz mentioned, multiple actions were carried out in Q1 2026 to improve the ecosystem. Q2 will be a continuation of those positive efforts, along with many others.
The ACC is a body that seeks the good not only of the community, but also of the ambassadors as promoters of our ecosystem. If you do not trust its actions, which are reported quarterly (as in this thread), you are free to create a forum post proposing a better structure based on impartiality, rather than just personal opinions without supporting arguments.
We’re always happy to receive feedback with respect, always.