very strange this statement. We have been in direct contact with the core team for 3 years, including you. We are a company that pays employees and pays taxes (I don’t know if the same can be said for others here).
We asked you personally before committing and working to develop on the astar network to let us understand what our reward would be and you shared a predictive table with us, remember?
We did our calculations and decided to make the proposal for AgeOfChronos. After a few weeks you decided to impose v3. I don’t want to get into the merits, just don’t tell me that it was a community choice because it wasn’t, just as it won’t be a community choice to choose the deserving dapps and who is applying for other roles lately. There’s no point in explaining why, you understand it by yourself.
Our dapp tripled its users and stakers, we had more than 200, all from our community and for only 100k astar had a 95% reduction in rewards for more than a month, leading us to then move by force to Moonbeam.
You have not responded to us for weeks, neither you nor the core team, you delegated a person who was dealing with something completely different to tell us “do more marketing”.
How can you make the statements made above, which are yet another accommodation for a team that has been against the main entry rule to dappstaking for exactly 15 months?
Now you want a win win, I’m just wondering why. You are in large majority here above all colluding. There is little else to add, the fact that now a massive delisting of the majority of dapps is starting is not a good sign for your work. you were wrong and so much, instead of reaching a compromise path you decided to allow the scam and punish those who asked for fairness.
Our company lost $12,000 in 2024 because of the choice to focus on astar. The others, as far as I can see, without delivering anything, earned money that with the same product (or rather the idea of it, since it does not exist yet) they would not have collected in any context of web2. I wonder how such a thing can even be imagined.
These are the fake responses and fake interactions with no consequences after a year.
Your answer is predictable, yours or that of whoever will take your place here below:
Back on topic, enough talking about the past.
Too convenient, you must take your responsibilities.
We personally do not care about skylab. We have not collaborated with them because in the past we did not consider them serious. Maybe we were wrong, I can’t tell you that, the fact remains that for an idea similar to ours (but without any technical explanation) they raised funds and after 1 year, no dapp is actually active on astar, while we have explained the idea, worked without funds until March 2024, made an mvp in 3 months and will soon launch the finished game.
Whenever we have time, like in these end-of-year holidays, we will analyze existing dapps and if we can, we will put you in difficulty, in the same way we were put in difficulty regarding dappstaking and those who are part of it.
We are also still investors in astar, your tokens are in our end-of-year balance sheet, so we have every right to it.
You decided to create this climate among developers, there could have been a different cooperation and collaboration, but this would have affected the arrogance and earnings of a few.
So I repeat the question, why is this dapp still listed today?
15 months later, what did they use astar for? what are the onchain transactions made, what are the privileges that the network received. How can you talk about development for someone who not in 1-2-3 months but 15 has always declared that the game would be ready “the next month” and who today admits you:
- No interaction or idea on how to do it.
- Graphic product commissioned with the money received from dappstaking (milk cow, You core team also accused us of this when we ONLY PROPOSED the donkey gang migration to try to pull back in all the users disappointed by the AOC delist, about 200 of them and you didn’t even allow voting)
- no game and NO MVP after more than 1 year, even though from what is written it will be something assembled from other pre-existing things. Which remains something not prosecutable if you have the right commercial rights of use (I doubt it).
I expect answers and not personal criticisms towards us.
@AstarHood Robin Hoods don’t usually wait for the nobility to approve. Could you analyze the situation?